Sunday, 5 January 2014

Sedation


“Can’t you just put me to sleep to do that?”


Try to stay awake for this week’s topic…sedation. Insert drum and symbol noise here post awful joke.
There is a lot of confusion over methods of pain and anxiety relief used by dentists. This mainly comes from back in t’ day when regular high street dentists, officially known as General Dental Practitioners or GDP’s happily knocked people out to carry out dental treatment.
In 1998 the General Dental Council acted to construct more stringent standards for the use of general anaesthetic for dental treatment as sadly, several people popped their clogs in the dental chair. It endorsed the need for Conscious Sedation provision rather than the continuing provision of General Anaesthesia as a demand led service i.e. for everyone who came in needing a tooth out, a filling, a check up, would no longer automatically receive general anaesthetic as standard.
Although the publication of the GDC regulations  was followed by a substantial reduction in the use of general anaesthesia for dental treatment, two further deaths occurred outside hospital following general anaesthesia for dental treatment. Following several more rather tedious but nevertheless important reports, a final set of regulations were developed which state that “by 31 December 2001, all general anaesthesia for dental treatment should be administered in a hospital setting with critical care facilities.
This led, positively, to an increase in the use of sedation. Sadly, the dentists of yesteryear – yes even as recently as 2001 – were not so good on the communication front and either through this or through lack of knowledge themselves did not adequately explain to patients the difference between general anaesthetic, aka being knocked out, being put to sleep, and sedation.
For this reason we still on a daily basis see patients booked in on clinics to receive sedation for their dental treatment who either a) are unsuitable for sedation (I will explain further below, these people are usually weeded out at the consultation appointment but some still manage to wiggle through the net) OR b) believe they are going to be asleep i.e. have general anaesthetic for the procedure,
Why does it matter? I hear you ask. Well in some cases you are right. Why some people feel the need to be asleep to have a filling when others will happily have half their face hacked off without even a local anaesthetic is a mystery however our friends at the GDC state “dentists have a duty to provide and patients have a right to expect adequate and appropriate pain and anxiety control”. In some cases, due to general or mental health issues, or in fact the nature of the dental procedure alone, local anaesthetic simply is not enough.

Therefore there are several options ON TOP OF local anaesthetic than can be considered. The reason I slipped onto the old caps lock button is because sedation is not the be all and end all. It helps you relax, stay calm, prevent certain stress-related illnesses from escalating during treatment, it does not however provide complete pain relief and so local anaesthetic – yes the one via the needle – is still vital and patients need to be made aware of this otherwise you will find yourself in front of the not-so-friendly GDC being accused of assault.

How we can help

Here is the wordy bit. In order to eliminate confusion caused by the aforementioned poor communicators, we now refer to sedation as “conscious sedation” purely because you remain fully conscious for the entire time. Yes that’s right, you are not asleep, in a coma, and in fact remain fully in control of your body movements including the very important (if not slightly annoying) gag reflex, ability to open and close the mouth etc.

Here is exactly what I said above but in nice technical terms;
“conscious sedation is a technique in which the use of a drug…produces a state of depression of the central nervous system enabling treatment to be carried out, but during which verbal contact with the patient is maintained throughout the period of sedation. The drugs and techniques used to provide conscious sedation for dental treatment should carry a margin of safety wide enough to render loss of consciousness unlikely.

Delivery of conscious sedation comes in several forms – inhalation i.e. you breathe in the drug, or intravenous i.e. the drug is given directly into the bloodstream.

Inhalation Sedation

The drug you inhale is the same thing they give pregnant women when giving birth – laughing gas known as Nitrous Oxide. This chemical has the added quality over intravenous sedation of providing pain relief when inhaled. The American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (AAPD) helpfully describe it as a colourless gas with a faint, sweet smell. It is an effective analgesic (pain relieving)/anxiolytic (anxiety relieving) agent causing central nervous system (CNS) depression and euphoria with little effect on the respiratory system. Translation: it makes you calm and happy without compromising any breathing reflexes or causing harm to the lungs or airways which is particularly important in people with things like asthma, where irritation of the airways can cause problems.


Pros
Cons
Quickly excreted from lungs – so effects wear off rapidly
Need for flow of pure oxygen after delivery of nitrous oxide as it leaves the blood stream much quicker than oxygen can replace it. Not really a disadvantage as 100% oxygen feels awesome and is automatically available wherever inhalation sedation is being given
No airway irritation
Feeling of loss of control
Nitrous oxide is absorbed rapidly, allowing for both rapid onset (two to three minutes)
You have to wear a mask in order to breathe the gas, anyone suffering from claustrophobia may struggle with this
It causes minimal impairment of any reflexes, thus protecting the cough reflex however has the added benefit of reducing very strong gag reflexes allowing certain treatment to be carried out that otherwise the patient may not be able to tolerate e.g. impressions
You need to be able to breathe through your nose, therefore if you have trouble with this e.g. broken nose, a cold, then you are unsuitable for this type of sedation
Extremely safe when used correctly
For the same reason as above, if treatment required needs us to be near your top front teeth, the mask gets in the way and so is not suitable
Extremely effective at reducing anxiety/ increasing tolerance to dental procedures particularly long or more difficult treatment.
It does not work alone. That is to say, the drug is not powerful enough used by itself to relieve all anxiety. It requires reassurance and “behavioural management” to be effective.


Who is it suitable for:

1.    Anxious patients. It is important to ascertain the reason for anxiety. As I mentioned above, it is still necessary to have local anaesthetic injections (yes, the dreaded needle) with ALL types of sedation and so while you care less when you under conscious sedation, if the fear of needles is extensive then the patient will be unsuitable for treatment under sedation.
2.    A patient whose gag reflex interferes with dental care;
3.    Patients where good, effective local anaesthesia cannot be achieved e.g. heavily infected teeth, low pain threshold
4.    A cooperative child undergoing a lengthy dental  procedure.
5.    Patients will well controlled diseases that can be worsened by stress e.g. angina, asthma

Contraindications for use of nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation may include:

1.    some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) – certain tests will be performed before placing a patient on a list for inhalation sedation, and the results of these tests will determine whether or not patients are suitable
2.    severe emotional disturbances. As mentioned above, the inhalation sedation does not work alone in reducing anxiety or making a patient feel like what you are about to do to their teeth is within the realms of something they can tolerate. Certain mental health disorders are too difficult to manage using the techniques of inhalation sedation
3.    drug-related dependencies. This includes alcohol as the metabolism of the drug, i.e. the way it works is affected heavily by certain drugs and alcohol.
4.    first trimester of pregnancy. Ideally we avoid inhalation sedation but it is still preferred over general anaesthetic so it is taken on a case by case basis.
5.    Severe heart disease, again, as with the respiratory problems, the results of pre-op tests will give us an idea of the level of disease and therefore whether sedation is appropriate
6.    Blood problems – Including factor deficiencies e.g. haemophilia, nutrient deficiencies e.g. anaemia
7.    As mentioned before , anything that prevents or makes it difficult for a patient to breathe through their nose which could be as simple as a current or recent cold.  


Now we have gone through all that, which involves enough paperwork to fell a small forest, if you are deemed suitable for sedation there are certain things that you must or must not do.

Oh by the way, this is what it looks like

 



See, even children can do it. You just breathe in through the nose, and out usually through the mouth because it is open for us to do the treatment. It is quite tight fitting and you feel a bit like a horse with a nose bag, but you are being pumped with the wonder that is nitrous oxide, so you couldn’t care less.
Some people would describe the feeling of receiving the sedation as like “being a bit drunk”. As a health professional I of course cannot comment on this but a friend told me a the warm glow after a few glasses of wine comes pretty close to the feeling of sedation.

Dos and Don’ts

  1. Don’t starve but don’t stuff yourself either. Some people say that inhalation sedation makes them feel a bit sick and a full stomach won’t help with this feeling. A light meal a few hours before treatment is perfect.
  2. A responsible adult escort must accompany the patient home from the dental surgery and assume responsibility for the patient’s post-sedation care.
  3. Wherever possible arrangements should be made for the patient and escort to travel home by private car or taxi rather than public transport. Where this is not possible, the escort must be made aware of the added responsibilities of caring for the patient during the journey home.
  4.  No alcohol 24 hours before AND after the sedation.
  5. Take your regular medication as  normal as this will have been factored into the decision of whether you a patient is suitable for sedation and so there is no need to stop if you have been deemed appropriate.


Intravenous Sedation

This involves use of drug called Midazolam, and less frequently Propofol.  This I suppose could be considered as a slightly stronger form of conscious sedation and is often the culprit which causes confusion between sedation and general anaesthetic. The drug/magic potion is given via a cannula in the back of the hand/inside of the elbow which is the same as with general anaesthetic, hence the mix up.


 



Despite the needle only being present for a matter of seconds, a severe needle phobia will also rule out intravenous sedation alone. As with inhalation sedation, local anaesthetic injections will also be required after the sedation agent is given. Usually by the point people are happy for you to take a pneumatic drill to their face but the inserting of the cannula on someone particularly anxious can be very stressful and if this is the case then they are unsuitable for this form of anaesthesia. In some cases, inhalation or oral sedation (a tablet) can be given prior to the insertion of the cannula and this can often be enough to alleviate the patient’s worries about needles enough for sedation to be given.

Because of the drug given for IV sedation, there are a few more contraindications for this type of sedation vs Inhalation.
The same reasons for giving inhalation sedation also apply for IV sedation however a few more can be added, for example, patients suffering from epilepsy or Parkinsons disease would benefit from treatment under IV sedation as the drug given for sedation has strong action against involuntary movements for instance those that occur during an epileptic seizure.

Who IV sedation is NOT suitable for.

1.    Very young or very old patients. The reason for this is that the drug is broken down by the liver, kidneys etc and if these are not functioning at the correct level the patient can have a very unpredictable level of sedation. The same applies for patients with severe liver or kidney disease (including alcoholics who may have a poorly functioning liver without knowing it)
2.    Pregnancy (you literally cannot do ANYTHING fun when pregnant)
3.    Severe hormone issues e.g. thyroid disease, poorly controlled diabetes, adrenal insuffiency treated with steroids

Whilst this does not rule out patients from receiving IV sedation, certain medications amplify the effects of sedation and so the delivery of the drug will need to be modified. The list of drugs is fairly extensive but includes:
1.    Antihistamines (e.g. for allergies including hayfever)
2.    Antihypertensives (blood pressure)
3.    Alcohol
4.    Opioid drugs  – the legal or illegal kind
5.    Anti epileptic drugs – because they often have the same action as midazolam used for sedation
6.    Anti depressants
7.    Obesity. For several reasons.
a.    Finding a vein
b.    Unpredictable metabolism (breaking down and using )of the drug by the body
c.    Difficult monitoring of breathing rate, heart rate etc which is VITAL throughout sedation
d.    Difficulty in treating medical emergencies e.g. if CPR is required
8.    Blood disorders – haemophilia, thalassemia, sickle cell anaemia etc

IV sedation makes you feel a bit more drunk than with inhalation sedation, but again, all within the boundaries of the nice happy warm place before you decide late night karaoke/snogging your boss is a good idea.
The added benefit of IV sedation is that is SOME people it causes loss of memory for the time that the sedation was given. Whilst this is beneficial sometimes because it means the patient may not remember a possibly not so nice bit of dental treatment, it also means that the patient may not remember how well they coped/how calm they felt, and so every time they have sedation, their fears remain the same because it feels like the first time even after 50 attempts. I must stress that whilst this amnesia occurs a lot, it cannot be promised, and some people remember everything.  

The Dos and Don’ts remain relatively the same. No alcohol. Escort is required. However because IV sedation takes much longer to wear off and be completely eradicated from the body, extra care has to be taken for 24 hours. This means no signing of important documents, no cooking (beyond a microwave ready meal), no looking after children, no driving. Therefore, the responsibilities of the escort that a patient chooses are greater than with inhalation sedation.
As with inhalation sedation, starvation is not recommended before IV sedation however we recommend not to eat for 2 hours prior to Midazolam sedation, or 6 hours before use of Propofol.

Again, whilst there seems to be a long list of dos and don’ts in summary. Conscious sedation implies that the patient has:
• Minimally depressed consciousness
• Ability to maintain open airway
• Protective reflexes maintained

• Response to physical and verbal stimulation (European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry)

 

i.e. YOU ARE NOT ASLEEP. NOT EVEN A BIT. NOPE. NOT EVEN DOZING.


Sedation is an extremely useful tool in treating lots of different people for lots of different reasons. For most of us it is given as an option for taking out wisdom teeth because this can often be a more extensive procedure than having a scale and polish so do not be afraid to ask to be referred for it!

Where I borrowed stuff from

General Anaesthesia for Dental Treatment in a Hospital Setting with Critical Care Facilities, Chief Dental Officer, 31 May 2001
GENERAL DENTAL COUNCIL, Maintaining Standards, paragraph 4.8
Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme Conscious Sedation in Dentistry Dental Clinical Guidance Second Edition 


Wednesday, 18 December 2013

My current rant topic: E Cigarettes

Even the writing of the above “product” as a title offends me. For those who have managed to bypass the tsunami of people walking the streets/sitting on public transport/your favourite restaurant with what looks like a tiny musical flute sticking out of their mouth, e cigarettes are the new “cool” way to smoke.
They are advertised as being the best thing you can do for your health and from the sheer volume of marketing bumph surrounding them you would think they were some sort of miracle that purified even the finest mountain air.

In this blog post I will therefore attempt to work out
1)      What the hell they are
2)      What the hell is in them
3)      Why the hell people think it is acceptable to use them like a lollipop


The premise of the e cigarette is that it is supposedly a healthier alternative to regular cigarettes because they do not contain tobacco. This sounds all well and good as we know the damage that tobacco can cause – in particular reference to my area of “expertise” it can lead to a whole range of oral cancers which can involve not just the areas of your mouth visible when you yawn but a whole realm of other areas in the head and neck. Most brands of this device also claim that they do not contain tar. Another benefit of course unless of course you wish for your lungs to look like the surface of the M6.
They were primarily designed as an addition to the realms of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) alongside patches, gum, medication like Champix etc and therefore used to cut down smoking.
All of this sounds very positive, so much so that one lady who switched to using a certain brand of the e cigarette to write the poem below:

No more cigarettes for me
What could I do, I liked the taste
Went to e-cigarette with much haste
Cigarettes without the bad bits
Made it easy to kick the habit
They come in lots of different flavours
For me to try and quickly savour
The prices are great
Delivery is never late
So give Smokers Angel a go
And try their range of Halo

Now that is quite a gushing testimonial. Similarly, the woman below appears extremely pleased with her e cigarette. It has even managed to get her a gentleman willing to photobomb her holiday snaps.  What could possibly be so bad.

 



On that note, let’s see if we can find any information at all about what is in them. Now trust me, I spent a good few hours trying to research this and the only thing I consistently came across was marketing BS. So I turned to the BMA (as I so often do)

What are they?

“E-cigarettes are battery-powered products designed to replicate smoking behaviour without the use of tobacco – some look like conventional cigarettes, while others appear more like an electronic device”  They consist of a cartridge containing liquid nicotine, an atomiser (heating element), a rechargeable battery, and electronics.

E-cigarettes have been marketed as cheap and healthier alternatives to cigarettes as well as to look and feel like cigarettes for use in places where smoking is not permitted since they do not produce  smoke. E-cigarettes are products operated by a single use or rechargeable battery that heats a liquid based solution (often containing nicotine) into a vapour. This is then inhaled by the user, simulating the effect of cigarette smoking.

They are primarily used (apparently) as a means to quit smoking and therefore the major studies conducted on e-cigarettes have analysed nicotine content, as addiction to this apparently why people cannot quit smoking. “An analysis of the total level of nicotine generated by e-cigarettes which vaporise nicotine effectively found that the amount inhaled from 15 puffs was lower compared with smoking a conventional cigarette”. Please note the extremely vague wording used by the usually extremely un-vague British Medical Association. Another study analysed sixteen e-cigarette brands and found the total level of nicotine in vapour generated by 20 series of 15 puffs varied from 0.5 to 15.4 mg. Again, there is no regulation, nor any standard or reproducible results that can be produced from e cigarette testing.

In 2009, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released results of an analysis of some e-cigarette product, it showed that the tested e-cigarette cartridges contained carcinogens and toxic chemicals. Analysis of two leading brands by the FDA also revealed:
  • diethylene glycol (a toxic chemical) in one cartridge at approximately 1%
  • tobacco-specific nitrosamines (which are human carcinogens) in half of the samples
  •  tobacco-specific impurities suspected of being harmful to humans (anabasine, myosmine, and ßnicotyrine) in a majority of the samples


The tests also suggested that quality control was inconsistent or non-existent:

  • cartridges with the same label emitted a markedly different amount of nicotine with each puff
  • one high-nicotine cartridge delivered twice the amount of nicotine compared to a nicotine inhalation product approved by the FDA.

 i.e. the biggest food and drug regulatory body in the world cannot conclusively say that is in the products or what they give out.

See next subheading.

E cigarettes – the new enemy?

Whilst I absolutely cannot deny that any improvement on smoking normal cigarettes is beneficial to health in general and therefore oral health, e cigarettes are a dangerous realm to enter into.
The reason they are cheaper is because they are not taxed in the same way as regular cigarettes. Hurray, I hear you shout. Sadly, these taxes pay my wages in the NHS, they also put people off smoking because it makes it so darn expensive. Without this deterent what is to stop people continuing to pump dangerous chemicals into their bodies. Similarly, they are not regulated in the same way as normal cigarettes. For cigarettes to be sold they have to go through rigorous quality control, the same does not apply for e cigarettes. Due to this, we have absolutely no clue what is in them.
All that can be said is that they are not licensed as a medicine in the UK, and there is no peer-reviewed evidence that they are safe or effective for the purpose of helping to cut down smoking, as a “healthier” alternative to smoking or in fact any other reason except making you look like you’re smoking a marker pen.

The World Health Organisation document (which is 50 pages long I might add); WHO STUDY GROUP ON TOBACCO PRODUCT REGULATION raises further concern about the use of these products as nicotine replacement therapy. “Delivery of nicotine to the lung raises concern about safety and addiction that go beyond that related to currently approved NRT, concern…is associated with the probable exposure of the lung to repeated dosing, perhaps hundreds of times a day for many months, if these products are used as a smoking cessation aid, or for years, for smokers who use them as long-term cigarette substitutes”. That is to say, the delivery of nicotine directly to the lungs has never before been studied, and whilst manufacturers get away with using certain chemicals in e-cigarettes because they approved for human consumption, we have no idea of the effect they have when inhaled.

Most people who purchase and use e-cigarettes claim they do so as a means to cut down on smoking i.e. smoking cessation, instead of things like patches, gum and so on. Sadly, the World Health Organisation(WHO) who govern most of what we do in terms of medication, health choices, prevention etc state that “as of July 2013, the efficacy in using electronic cigarettes to aid in smoking cessation has not been demonstrated scientifically”. They tend to err on the side of caution as they are such a huge body of people of differing backgrounds and motivations that having a strong unified opinion on something is a difficult task. However, so unified was their opinion in this case that they recommend "consumers should be strongly advised not to use" electronic cigarettes until a reputable national regulatory body has found them safe and effective”. Nuff said.

The British Medical Association have also been forced to offer up an opinion on the damn things and their summary is not much more positive than the WHO. They state that “four out of five e-cigarette users continue smoking, and use e-cigarettes primarily as a substitute where smoking is not allowed” thus completely defeating the object of switching to e-cigarettes for a smoking cessation purpose. Again, the BMA agree, expressing their concern that e-cigarettes may undermine smoking prevention and cessation, as their use is likely to reinforce the normalcy of the smoking behaviour”.
This normalcy was nicely illustrated just last week when I walked past a patient sitting IN THE DENTAL HOSPITAL WAITING ROOM smoking one of these devices, regarding me with confusion at my anger with her behaviour. Similarly, the fact that the e cigarettes are generally quite aesthetically pleasing and gadgetty-looking means that people are far more likely to openly smoke them, and thus consume more nicotine than they would should they smoke their normal cigarettes, thus negating the intended purpose of switching.

Our Australian cousins also echo this. “Other unintended consequences of e-cigarette use include the potential to induce nicotine addiction in non- smokers or maintain addiction in current smokers who might otherwise quit. Furthermore, concerns have been raised that e-cigarettes may undermine the comprehensive indoor  smoking restrictions and smokefree air policies” and making it generally acceptable for people to be seen smoking after years of hard work aiming to make them feel as embarrassed about smoking in public as public urination – people still do it but its few and far between, although maybe I grace the wrong areas of town at the wrong time of night.

The National Institute for Health Care and Excellence (NICE) recently published new public health guidance backing the use of licensed nicotine products to help people cut down as well as stop smoking. However, these guidelines did not cover e-cigarettes. Again, without having to say it, I imagine several suited men sitting round a table and laughing at the concept of e-cigarettes even being considered in this category of something that they would advise or recommend as something of health benefit.

Now of course, I cannot complete an analysis of the use of this product without referring to the superpowers of the USA – namely the Food and Drug Administration department (FDA). They basically regulate everything that is consumed, injected or applied by our friend across the pond and thus you could argue, have probably become fairly used to seeing products come and go, and are unlikely to have any emotional response related to items they are asked to assess. So strongly therefore did the FDA feel about e cigarettes that way back in 2010 long before the e cigarette phenomenon reached our shores, they issued warning letters to a grand total of 5 electronic cigarette distributors for various violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) including unsubstantiated claims and poor manufacturing practices. What is more worrying is that the FDA only regulates products intended for therapeutic use i.e. as a nicotine replacement therapy, and therefore, if a company decides to purely register their e cigarette product as recreational, or a hobby based item, then it completely negates all regulation by any drug agencies. Still fancy puffing away on one of them?

Dental Impact

What most people don’t consider is the effect that smoking has on their mouth. Whilst smoking e cigarettes should technically reduce risk of oral cancer, the presence of carcinogens in most of the leading brand’s e cigarettes negates this benefit. Similarly, the main causative factor of smoking related gum disease is nicotine. As the e cigarettes are rammed with the stuff, they offer no benefit in terms of “the leading cause of tooth loss” (thanks Corsodyl). That is to say, puffing away on your e-cigarette is just as harmful to your gums as smoking regular cigarettes and so your path on the road to dentures is just as speedy. In fact the WHO state that 90% of the nicotine that people smoking e-cigarettes are so desperate to get into their lungs, is actually deposited in the mouth.

In Summary.

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom reported that it planned to regulate e-cigarettes as medicines from 2016 when new European tobacco laws come into force so until then, it remains that we have no idea what e-cigarettes are. In my mind, used as a nicotine replacement therapy, i.e. to smoke less and less over a set period until smoking has been stopped, completely, is fine, so long as they smoke it miles away from me, not around children, and that the whole thing stops being glamorised.

What I trawled through in order to write this blog:

BMA, E-cigarettes in public places and workplaces A briefing from the BMA Occupational Medicine Committee and the Board of Science, March 2012
BMA calls for stronger regulation of e-cigarettes
March 2012 (updated January 2013) A briefing from the Board of Science and the Occupational Medicine Committee

Sunday, 3 November 2013

Wisdom twooth

Hello all.

If you have returned for the second instalment of my wisdom tooth rant then I thank you! I realise the last one was a bit of a slog but hopefully it provided some basic information about the problems wisdom teeth cause.

I discussed pericoronitis last time, which is the most common problem wisdom teeth cause. I also briefly mentioned that if you rocked up to your dentist, or worse, the dental hospital, demanding extraction (whipping out) of your wisdom teeth because they don’t look very nice, they are the cause of all your life problems (failure of your marriage, loss of job etc) then sadly you will be met by a wall of silence and handed a “bye bye” discharge letter.

Unfortunately, as with most things, there are risks to taking out all teeth. Wisdom teeth are particularly troublesome (to put it mildly, I would quite frankly say they are a pain in the arse) to take out.  This is mostly because of the position right at the back of the mouth, or as mentioned before that they are literally wedged in place often below the gum line. They are also a bit of an anomaly. Whilst most teeth have a generally accepted anatomy, wisdom teeth are a law unto themselves, a bit like Miley Cyrus or Lady Gaga – you never know what you’re going to get from one day to the next. They can have 1-3 roots of different angles, either splayed out or fused together. They can be surrounded by bone, or even be fused to the jaw bone. Therefore, if we can avoid taking them out – much as we enjoy getting out our pneumatic drills and nail guns – if you don’t absolutely need them removing, you don’t get them extracted. Especially not by me.

The most important reason for why we are hesitant about taking wisdom teeth out however is due to unavoidable potential side effects, the most important being nerve damage.

In order to explain this I am sadly going to have to describe the process of extracting wisdom teeth in some detail. If you are at all squeamish, you may wish to skim over this bit.

Of course, if you have a fully erupted wisdom tooth, i.e. it is fully visible in the mouth just like all the other (normal, non-pain-in-the-arse-causing) teeth, then the procedure for taking it out is no different to other teeth.
However when the tooth is partially erupted, or unerupted, it is surrounded by bone and there is very little/no tooth to grab hold of with our highly advanced sci-fi (not) forceps. In this case we have to do something called “minor oral surgery”. As opposed to major oral surgery which I imagine entails something similar to beheading and fortunately not performed by any of us toothworkers. Well, not intentionally anyway.

Minor oral surgery for wisdom teeth
As the wisdom tooth is surrounded by bone, in order to take it out, we have to remove some of this bone, and the only way to do this is peel back (sorry, I desperately consulted several thesauruses for a better way of phrasing this but this genuinely is the best way of describing what we do) the gum and then drill away some of the bone in the same way that we drill to do a filling.

Before you go into panic mode, the important thing to remember is that the only difference between a “normal” extraction and this method is that we directly visualise the roots of the teeth that we are trying to take out. In some ways this is actually easier and often means that less “force” is required to take the teeth out as we can get a better leverage and see exactly what we are working with – i.e. 3 roots, 2 roots, fused roots etc.
The same amount of anaesthetic (if not slightly more because we often book longer for this minor oral surgery appointments than we do for regular extractions) is used, and the only difference you will actually be aware of is the noise/vibration that occurs when removing bone, and the fact that you will have some stitches in place afterwards.
So here goes.

How to (surgically) take out a wisdom tooth for dummies.
1)    2 or 3 cuts are made in the gum. Again, please remember you will be completely numb for this, so you will feel that we are there/pressure but not pain.

2)    The wisdom tooth will then be hidden behind a layer of bone.
Sadly, Google seems to want to terrify people into never attending a dentist ever again and thus most pictures I could locate were not appropriate for this blog, unless I want to do myself out of employment of course.


 It is at this point that I suppose the most “risky” aspect of the extraction arises.

  

This nerve supplies sensation i.e. feeling for HALF the lower lip (the half being whichever side the tooth you are talking about is, i.e. right tooth, right half of lip), some of the skin of the cheek, and half of the lower teeth. It is important to mention that it does not provide motor or movement supply to these areas.
When extracting LOWER wisdom teeth damage can occur to this nerve. The wisdom tooth can be sitting on the nerve and when it gets wiggled out this can irritate the nerve. The roots can be wrapped around the nerve and on taking it out more damage can occur. Sometimes the tooth itself is not actually touching the nerve but in order to extract the tooth, bone has to be removed and this can cause damage to the nerve. See below. #freeadvertisingforthisguy






This means that following the extraction it will feel like you are still numb. Like when you have an injection before a filling for a lower tooth, that sensation will continue past the time when the anaesthetic wears off. There are various figures in the literature about 1) the chances of this damage happening and 2) whether or not the sensation comes back.  They estimate that there is around a 2% risk of damage occurring to this nerve during lower wisdom tooth extraction. Of course if you need an upper tooth out, this risk is irrelevant. In terms of whether this sensation will return, there is again debatable evidence. It is most common that the disturbance to feeling is temporary i.e. it will return, usually fully, however it is estimated that 0.6 to 2.2 percent of cases of people who lose sensation after wisdom tooth extraction will have this permanently.
What this means in terms of your daily life is that nothing will be visibly different either whilst your face is still, or if your face is moving. Your lip etc will move normally, it will just feel different i.e. numb or have a pins and needles sensation. It is however important to point out that there is a small chance that by leaving infection or pathologies (e.g. cysts) around wisdom teeth, the same nerve damage can occur but is much less predictable so it really is best to get them out in this case.  

Whilst we will always take an xray of the tooth to be extracted, and have a good idea of where the nerve is positioned, radiographs (x ray images) are only a 2D image of a 3D situation so the only really guaranteed information they can give us is “yes the tooth is close to the nerve” or “no the tooth is miles away”. Luckily some Hungarian oral surgeons have completed a study and summarise this nicely “radiography [i.e. taking and interpretation of x ray pictures] is an inadequate screening method for predicting IAN [inferior alveolar nerve] paraesthesia after mandibular [i.e. lower] third molar removal



Back to the surgical bit….


3)    Following bone removal so that we can see the tooth,  it is then extracted. This is done in a number of ways but for the purposes of how much you need to know and what you will be aware of, at this point you will feel pressure and lots of wiggling of equipment from our part.
4)    Once the tooth is out, we will then replace the flap back over the area and place a couple of stiches to hold it in place. These will dissolve by themselves but you will of course be aware of them.

As with any extraction, you will be sore afterwards. As you can see, the procedure is slightly more involved than the normal, grab-it-pull-it-out technique that we can use on other teeth, so expect to feel a bit naf for a few days. Your dentist will give you lots of aftercare instructions and things to expect straight after you have gone through this and thus you won’t listen to a word so I will summarise.


1)    Pain, swelling.  I have lumped these 2 together because it is pretty much guaranteed that you will experience these. In terms of pain, the best medication to take is paracetamol and ibuprofen. You do not require codeine or in fact as I have been asked for on several occasions – ketamine. Please check that you are ok to take ibuprofen. It is one of a group of drugs called NSAID’s and can cause problems for certain asthma sufferers, people with kidney disease, stomach problems etc. Also, if you are already taking an anti-inflammatory medication e.g. for arthritis, back pain, then do not increase your dose.
Swelling will reach a maximum after 48 hours then begin to go down. You may also notice some bruising if it is a particularly difficult extraction. Expect the worse basically, then you will be pleasantly surprised.
2)    Bleeding. This is where people get confused. If you have the tooth “surgically” removed, the wound will be stitched. This can help reduce but not eliminate bleeding. If you do not have stitches, there will be some oozing of the area. The small amount of blood coming from the socket where the tooth was taken from, mixes with saliva and causes people to panic that they are bleeding out and have seconds to left to live without a transfusion.
We will usually give you some squares of gauze to take home with you. If you feel that the area is actually bleeding, i.e. when you spit out, it is red not just pink, then roll one of these gauze pieces up into a sausage and bite for 20 mins. If bleeding continues you need to return to your own dentist or go to A+E.
3)    Infection. When you cut yourself elsewhere on the body, in order for it to heal you want a scab to form. In the mouth it is a similar concept but you want a blood clot rather than a scab. If you do a gym session, lift heavy objects, raise your blood pressure in any number of ways, this will dislodge the clot and leave a gunky mess in the socket. Gunky mess = no healing. Similarly, if you decide to leave the dental surgery and have a fag, the same thing will occur. You will then come back crying to us in more pain than you were with the toothache, with something called “dry socket”.
Heat will also increase blood pressure, so don’t hold anything hot against the side of the face to try and ease discomfort because it will just make it worse in the long run.





If this does occur, go back to the dentist and we will place a dressing in. This works wonders but it tastes repulsive so let that be a warning to you.

4)    In terms of keeping the area clean, brush the other teeth as normal. SPIT DON’T RINSE FOR 24 HOURS. As above, if you rinse and swill around the mouth vigorously, you will dislodge the blood clot and end up in the above situation. For 24 hours just spit out any blood stained saliva you feel is building up. After 24 hours, start with some hot salt water mouthwashes. Get some hot water, fill a mug or a cup, add a teaspoon of salt, GENTLY swish this around your mouth and spit out until the cup of water is gone. If you don’t do this, you will get nice bits of your roast dinner, cereal etc building up in the socket which then I have to fish out. Usually before lunch. Please save me having to do this.
5)    If you have any concerns, please just ring your dentist. They can advise you, settle worries, and recommend you come in for a check if necessary.

Finally, just when you are wondering why the hell anyone would choose to do this to themselves, there are a number of myths surrounding extraction of wisdom teeth and why/when we take them out. For this I require the assistance of the wonderful people at the National Institute for Clinical Excellent (NICE) who provide helpful although thoroughly not-NICE guidance on a number of clinical topics.

Because of the aforementioned risks of taking wisdom teeth out – pain, bleeding, swelling, infection, nerve damage etc – we will try not to do it if we can. NICE in fact says that there is no reliable research to suggest that impacted wisdom teeth free from disease should be operated on.
They classify “disease” as decay which cannot be fixed by filling or root canal treatment, either because it has gone too far or because the tooth is at such an angle that we simply cannot treat it. Similarly, if it is causing damage to next door teeth, this is a valid reason for removal. Wisdom teeth are also deemed to be valid for “the bucket” if they are in the path of a cysts, tumour, or cancer which needs removal.
In terms of the aforementioned pericoronitis, NICE basically suggest it is a bit of an opinion based deicision. They state that “plaque formation is a risk factor but is not in itself an indication for surgery…The evidence suggests that a first episode of pericoronitis, unless particularly severe, should not be considered an indication for surgery. Second or subsequent episodes should be considered the appropriate indication for surgery”. I.e. unless you have been back to the dentist several times with this problem, and we can see that you have been trying to resolve the situation yourself by keeping it clean, you will not qualify to have the tooth taken out.

To finish, the common myth that eruption of wisdom teeth causes crowding of the other teeth. I was going to paraphrase this paragraph from oralhealthgroup.com but it just summaries the absolute ludicrousy that this concept presents.
“It is not possible for lower third molars, which develop in the…interior bone…with no firm support, to push 14 other teeth with roots implanted vertically like the pegs of a picket fence so that the incisors in the middle twist and overlap. Third molars do not possess sufficient force to move other teeth. They cannot cause crowding and overlapping of the incisors, and any such association is not causation.

This is also supported by a number of studies of high evidence level (i.e. they were conducted by the highest level of boffin). I have included some of these below with boffin-normal person translations:

1)    No statistically significant third molar presence-specific differences were recorded in the lower dental arch crowding between the groups with erupted and unerupted third molars. i.e. people with crowding were examined and among these people it was noted whether or not they had wisdom teeth present. The study found that the crowding was completely unrelated to the presence of 3rd molars.

2)    The principal conclusion drawn from this randomized prospective study is that the removal of third molars to reduce or prevent late incisor crowding cannot be justified. Now us tooth workers love nothing more than whipping out teeth so this is a fairly significant finding. 

3)    The dental arches in the extraction group tended to be more crowded than in the group with complete dentitions. i.e. this study found that in cases where wisdom teeth had been extracted there was in fact MORE crowding. This is most likely a coincidence but just goes to show the lack of importance of wisdom teeth on crowding.

4)    This study has not been able to predict which patients should react favourably or unfavourably to removal of the third lower molars in cases of anticipated crowding. I.e. these guys haven’t got a clue.


In summary, if you are in pain from your wisdom tooth, get it out. Yes there are risks but there are also risks of leaving infection teeth in place.

As always, if I have terrified you and you wish to tell me this, or if you want any further explanation of any aspect, please feel free to comment on here, or follow me on twitter @smiles__better.


Ode to the boffins:

Forsberg Tooth size, spacing, and crowding in relation to eruption or impaction of third molars American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 94, Issue 1, July 1988, Pages 57–62
Friedman The Prophylactic Extraction of Third Molars: A Public Health Hazard Am J Public Health. 2007 September; 97(9): 1554–1559.

Harradine NW, Pearson MH, Toth B. The effect of extraction of third molars on late lower incisor crowding: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Orthod. 1998 May;25(2):117-22.

Lindqvist, Extraction of third molars in cases of anticipated crowding in the lower jaw American Journal of Orthodontics Volume 81, Issue 2, February 1982, Pages 130–139

NICE guidelines: Guidance on the Extraction of Wisdom Teeth


Sidlauskas A, Trakiniene G. Effect of the lower third molars on the lower dental arch crowding. Stomatologija. 2006;8(3):80-4.

Szalma J The prognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferior alveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molar removal: retrospective study of 400 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):294-302. Epub 2009 Oct 20.

http://www.toothology.net/getmedia.asp?media_id=52