Saturday 15 February 2014

Hang on, let me put my teeth in

I am hoping that this will be a short blog post but I seem to have an innate ability to waffle for extended periods of time about the most simple of topics and have in fact been penalised many a time for going over word limits so I will try my best!

When I started smiles—better, I decided I would only discuss subjects that I thought would be helpful to people rather than it just being another site of definitions/a rip off of Wikipedia, and so I had planned to stay away from the basics ins and outs of dentistry however after seeing possibly the most horrific and misleading piece of advertising since L’oreal used Cheryl Cole in a full face of make-up to promote their “no need for make-up” skin care, I decided that the topic of dentures needed to be approached.

I hereby call upon the British Dental Health Foundation:
What is a denture? (they even did the heading for me!)
“People wear dentures to replace lost or missing teeth so they can enjoy a healthy diet and smile with confidence”.

Now, my idea of the picture of health involves many green crunchy foodstuffs (I’ve always wanted to use that word) such as apples/celery and high protein items like nuts and steak. Now granted, I have only had 6 and a bit years of experience listening to people WHINGE AND COMPLAIN about their dentures, but I can pretty much guarantee that no one with a denture can successfully eat any of the aforementioned food products unless they are put in a blender first. Herein lies the first major flaw of dentures.
Sadly, adverts such as the one I spoke about in the intro, and that awful one where the man and the woman go apple bobbing and you have to guess who is wearing the denture (I wish they would tell you, or write it upside down at the bottom of the screen like in magazine puzzle pages where you have to spot the difference between the 2 pictures of Miley Cyrus, it continues to bug me that I don’t know the answer) are extremely deceptive and lead to people thinking that dentures are in fact an adequate replacement for natural teeth. At this point, I feel the following statement would help.

DENTURES ARE NOT REAL TEETH. THEY ARE PLASTIC. THEY DON’T HAVE ROOTS. THEY HAVE PLASTIC BOTTOMS WHICH REST ON GUM. (METAL IF YOU HAVE A DENTIST THAT IS FEELING PARTICULARLY RICH THAT UDA YEAR more on that later). THEY BASICALLY FLOAT IN YOUR MOUTH AND THUS ARE IN NO WAY LIKE YOUR NATURAL TEETH FROM “BACK IN T’DAY”

Annnndd exhale.

Time for everyone’s favourite bit; some anatomy/theory.

This is what mouths look like when teeth are lost. The picture on the left shows only some teeth missing whilst the gentleman (I’m assuming it’s a gentleman otherwise it’s a very stubbly lady) has sadly lost all of his teeth and is what we call, edentulous.







What I am trying to demonstrate here, is that a plastic pre formed surface fits against your gum. Your gum is squishy. In some people (usually those who have lost their upper teeth but still have some lower front teeth) their gum is particularly squishy. We call this “flabby ridge” (seriously, its in text books and everything). It is for this reason that the advert I mentioned right back at the start made me so furious. I have inserted the link below should any of you wish to subject yourself to some irritating American advertising.


What makes me most angry is that she suggests using Fixodent will stop your denture moving ENTIRELY. This is of course absolute rubbish. It will be “stuck” to gum, which will move. Similarly, she is suggesting that this will work wonders in the lower jaw. Do a quick test for me, have a feel of the bottom of your mouth – the bit under your tongue. It is pretty much covered in saliva if not pooled in the stuff. Sadly Fixodent is not waterproof. Thus, you can put layers of the stuff on your denture and within minutes it will be washed away and so you might as well just squirt some of the tube in your mouth and swallow it and save yourself the hassle.
While denture fixatives are extremely helpful for things like upper dentures they are pretty much useless on partial dentures particularly in the lower jaw.
Back to the British Dental Health Foundation:

Why should I wear dentures?

“Full dentures, to replace all your own teeth, fit snugly over your gums.”
Misconception number 1: They should indeed fit snugly over your gums however the fitting surface of the denture is made of a hard plastic material, and your gums are not. They are soft. Especially if you suffer from my aforementioned favourite dental condition, “flabby ridge”. 
Thus as I explained above, you need to accept that no denture will ever fit you “snugly” in every position your mouth will ever be in. If we make the denture fit when you are biting full force, they won’t fit when you have your mouth relaxed because the gum will be a different shape – imagine pinching your cheeks. The shape your cheeks go when pinched is dramatically different to the shape they are naturally. The same applies to your gums.
Whilst I seem to be a painting a negative picture, it is only to emphasise that dentures do not stay in by how they are made. This is of course a factor, and if you have shoddy dentures then no amount of practice will help you, however it is all about how you control them. Just as people take time to adjust to an artificial limb, it takes time to adjust to artificial teeth. Fortunately the muscles of your mouth – including the cheeks and tongue – are extremely powerful. Over time, your tongue adapts to gently rest against the denture and hold it in place. I have seen people function with broken dentures because of their muscular control. Yes, someone came to me with their denture split into 2 pieces and they were continuing to wear and eat with it just fine. However it takes perseverance.
Partial dentures replace teeth that are missing and can sometimes be supported by the teeth you have left. If you have gaps between your teeth, then your other teeth may move to take up some of the space, so you could end up with crooked or tilted teeth. This could affect the way you bite and could damage your other teeth”

Another misconception was brought to my attention by the website link for the above info from the British Dental Health Foundation. http://www.dentalhealth.org/tell-me-about/topic/older-people/dentures

Those eagle eyed readers amongst you will notice the highlighted phrase “older people”. Firstly, what is “old”. There are many people I could offend by attempting to put an age on it, and therefore I shall play the “don’t shoot the messenger” card and allow someone else to take the flack. CBS Statistics Netherlands seem to define “old” as over 65. 

They reckon that 6 out of 10 denture wearers fall into this over 65 category. Which means that 4 out of 10 people with dentures are under 65 which is a fairly significant number to me.

The United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004 has a slightly different slant.

Age
Mean Number of Permanent Teeth
20 to 34 years
26.90
35 to 49 years
25.05
50 to 64 years
22.30

The normal number of permanent teeth is 32 (including wisdom teeth which wouldn’t be replaced on a denture because as mentioned in previous blogs, they are fairly useless) and so let’s work on a total of 28 teeth. There is not really a minimum number of teeth to be lost before a denture is provided – sometimes a denture may be provided to replace one tooth, for instance if a front tooth is knocked out. Therefore, as you can see in the table, the figure for the 20-34 age group shows an average loss of at least 1 tooth. By age 49, the average amount of teeth lost goes up to just under 3.In the final category of 50-64 year olds the average tooth loss is slightly under 6 teeth. Which means that anywhere from 20-64 i.e. before hitting the ripe age of 65 (aka old), depending on the person and how many teeth they are happy to live without, any of these people could be provided with/be wearing a denture to replace the average 1-6 teeth they have lost.

Let’s view it another way

Characteristic
Percentage with no Remaining Teeth
Age
20 to 34 years
(not enough data)
35 to 49 years
2.63
50 to 64 years
10.13

The above table shows us how many of each age group have no teeth left and so are almost definitely wearing dentures. Again, as expected the largest percentage of people with no teeth is in the 50-64 age group, however this is still only 7/8% higher than the same figure for the 35-49 age group.
These are USA figures, but the UK percentages are fairly similar. The table below is from the most recent Adult Dental Health Survey conducted in 2009.

 





Again, whilst it shows that between 15 and 45% of those aged 65 and over have no teeth, 6% of people under 65 also had no teeth, which out of several thousand surveyed means several thousand people likely to be wearing dentures. Of course those with no teeth may also choose to have no dentures, and there are a variety of areas in between where there are some teeth missing and some teeth still present and therefore dentures would still be a viable option. In fact this idea is nicely summarised by the aforementioned survey “13 per cent [of people included in the survey] had natural teeth and dentures; 6 per cent were edentate with dentures; and less than 0.5 per cent were edentate with no dentures”

Now of course, I am not denying that the majority of denture wearers are in fact “getting on a bit” it is a horrible bias that leaves us dental folk in a very difficult position when we advise someone that their best option is to have a denture made for them, because they imagine the things their granny used to put in a cup by the side of her bed at night and the reality is that we can make things now that look pretty damn good. The problem is that dentures – however they are made and however fancy the practice you go to looks (imagine lots of glass panelling and flat screen tv’s) – are lumps of plastic. For this reason they will never be like the teeth you lost but as you will know from reading my implant post (which I’m sure all of you did) sometimes it is the only option left to you.

See next subheading.

Eating – or at least trying to.
Back to my favourite dental resource (the British Dental Health Foundation). They claim that dentures “will help you to eat comfortably”. Generally any dentist will tell you that pretty much every new denture patient they see will return within a fortnight saying “I just can’t eat with them in” or my favourites “oh the dentures are wonderful, I just take them out when I have to eat” which amuses me as why bother having dentures at all in that case?
The problem is that under the denture is squishy gum, and the teeth are plastic. The combination of these 2 things means that 1) when you bite into something the dentures move so you can’t apply the same chewing force that your natural teeth could apply 2) we all know how near impossible it is to eat with disposable plastic cutlery let alone try and cut into a steak and the same applies for plastic teeth.
Of course, there are exceptions to the rule like this fellow from a wonderful dental forum
“jroantree: I have just had top set 7 days ago. 10 teeth out, fitting 7 days before. follow up today with dentist 320 pounds, all done. I’m staying near Cape Town, come for a holiday and get your teeth fixed cheaper than UK. Eating chicken bread etc already."

Generally it takes practice. The same goes with speaking. Expect to lisp and slobber for a good few weeks after having your dentures fitted. If you are having your dentures fitted immediately after having teeth out (these are called immediate dentures funnily enough) then this will be increased because you are putting force and rubbing on a delicate area. This leads to soreness and an increase in saliva making it all more difficult so just give it time.


Now you have all the background info, I think that is quite enough waffling for today so I shall leave you with another of my favourite quotes from a dental forum.

"if any of you get a chance go have a look at the conditions some dental technicians work in, you might be shocked, particularly the cheaper/NHS part of the dental market. A lot is said of the poor, stressful working conditions of NHS Dentists, but dental technicians are a hidden, down-trodden profession”

Now before you all call the dental technician equivalent of the RSPCA I can assure you that I have met many of these poor down trodden fellows, and they are a wonderful breed and generally do not work in atrocity and squalor. Some of them even have radios on while they create their dental masterpieces.


Stay tuned for the next instalment when I go through how dentures are made and what to expect.



Reading and that

http://cdeworld.com/images/graphics/4469/lg/figure_23.jpg

Sunday 2 February 2014

Implants part 2. Prepare yourselves....

Part 2 Implant overview.

Hope you made it through the last without falling asleep/questioning why the hell you would read such a thing. This week’s post is going to detail a little more about the procedure of placing implants, long term care and general post implant placement information.

How long does the whole process take/what do I have to go through.

When answering this question there are various things to be considered, the main being whether or not the implants are placed and restored (i.e. placing of the crown or bridge or denture on top of the implant) in stages vs in one go.
I’m sure you will have all come across those adverts in the newspaper/the back of certain magazines that offer the operation to place the implant and then restoration of the implant in a day.
This is incredibly misleading, as it is virtually impossible to make a denture, crown or bridge to fit on an implant within a day, unless you have some sort of miracle lab and even then various impressions (moulds) need to be taken of your implants in order to get the best fit and appearance. If the dentist is just relying on one impression taken straight after the implants are placed when there is bleeding, swelling etc then it is highly unlikely that the crown/bridge/denture is going to fit, look good and work well. Thus if you went to a decent cowboy dentist they would require at least a couple of visits.
Now this only takes into consideration how it is going to look immediately. There is some debate within the implant community (a bunch of very cool people) about the length of time and number of stages that should occur for the best result.

ADI summarise this nicely.

“For routine cases, from the time of implant placement to the time of placing the first teeth, treatment times can vary between 6 weeks and 6 months. The availability of better bone can be used to decrease treatment time, whilst more time and care must be taken with poorer bone, which can therefore extend treatment times beyond six months”
They would class routine cases as simple tooth loss situations i.e. not following cancer treatment or illness, in patients with suitable bone.
When assessing all patients who are considering implants there is a basic structure of appointments etc that should be followed if you want to get the best out of the implants and not destroy your mouth.

Handy subtitle time…

Summary of stages for routine dental implants

Stage
Eh?
Other info – if you’re still with me
Diagnosis
Your current dentist may be the one who is offering to provide implants, in which case, they should be familiar with your mouth and hopefully should have been responsible for doing the groundwork for the time that you have been seeing them i.e. any fillings, treating gum disease etc. However different dentists will of course have different opinions and so if you are going to see an “implant specialist” in another practice, they may request that your own dentist carries out any dental repairs, filling replacements or extra courses of gum treatment. Hopefully they wont be pointing out anything too new and if they do i.e. “good GOD has a bomb gone off in your mouth”/ “you have RAGING gum disease” then you should perhaps consider finding a new general dentist.


Treatment planning
Treatment planning involves determination of where the implants are going to go. Certain things have to be considered at this point:
a.    Whether there is enough bone to support an implant
b.    Whether there is enough room to place an implant and its restoration (e.g. bridge, crown, denture)
c.    Whether placing an implant is going to affect any important things in the mouth i.e. the sinuses/nerves. See some pictures below for this.
a + b
The amount of bone and the amount of space have to be considered in various different dimensions. There are also different considerations for each area of the mouth due to the force that teeth take depending on their position in the jaw. The best way to explain this is with pictures. See below.




 1)    Vertical dimension: think of it as height of bone/space between the teeth or space between the jaws







Now the above situation is only for front teeth which generally take a lot less force. Yes you use your natural teeth to bite into apples etc which technically you can do with implants but with the amount they cost per piece you’ll probably want to be cutting your apples up into pieces from now on.

So, for crowns towards the back of the mouth we need more space because the restorations have to be much stronger as the back teeth take significant grinding forces. For this reason we need at least 3-4mm space between the implant abutment and the opposing teeth.

In the picture below you can see that the space between the abutment on the implant and the top teeth is only just 4 mm. In this case this simply is not enough to make a decent white crown. The reason for this is that the white bit of the crown – the ceramic – has to be a certain thickness to a) look good and b) be strong enough. At less than an ideal than an ideal thickness will look like a grey blob and/or break and fracture as soon as you try and eat something. So for the picture below, the only option would be to place a full metal crown which can be made much thinner due to the increased strength of metal over porcelain.







The final set of considerations in terms of measurements is for dentures.  There should be 10–12 mm of vertical space between the implants placed in either the top or bottom jaw (or in fact both) in order to place good sized teeth  

If a bar is used for the denture to clip onto – as opposed to simply clipping into the top of the abutments, then this measurement must allow for a space of 2mm between the gums and the bar so that it can be effectively cleaned under.

 

The next measurement to consider is width of the bone, i.e. between the cheeks/lips and the tongue/palate. Obviously these measurements all depend on the size of implants the specialist is intending to use. 3.25 mm diameter implants are the smallest available, according to dentalcare.com, 6mm width of bone is the minimal thickness into which 3.25 and 4 mm diameter implants can be placed.  Larger diameter implants (5 and 6 mm) require at least 7-8mm. Although these measurements are large enough to accommodate an implant, it means that the implant can only be placed in one direction as there is limited bone either side of the implant. .







So, miles back, I also mentioned the importance of checking for vital structures.

1)    The sinuses.
These are the bits in your face that get really painful when you have a cold.



2)    Nerves
 

 Once all the above nonsense has been assessed, and any bone grafts or sinus lifts have been performed (which the specialist can explain in far greater detail using your own xrays/scans and fun models etc) then we can get down to the good stuff and actually put the damn implants in.

Stage
Eh?
Other info – if you’re still with me
Implant Placement
Drilling the implant into the bone and the gum

There are 2 different schools of thought as to how exactly this should go. Of course, the screw part of the implant goes into the bone, but there is some debate as to whether this screw should then be covered back over and allowed to heal completely hidden below the gum, OR whether an extra bit (an abutment) should be placed on top which pokes through into the mouth, and allow the gum to heal around this.

Time for some more pictures
Implant placement is usually followed by a period of healing lasting from 6 weeks to 6 months.
Stitches are normally removed 7 to 10 days after the implant placement.



 Generally, the process goes a little like this.

1)    Tooth extracted

a.    At this point if you had/have a whopping infection like an abscess then the area will be allowed to heal for a while as placing an implant into infection is like building a house in sand (and we all know how that song goes)
b.    After this healing, a space for the implant to go in will need to be made, unlike if the tooth is just removed and there is a nice space there from where the tooth was sitting
c.    If the tooth is just being taken out because of trauma/decay/gum disease then an implant can be placed into the socket straight away

2)    A hole for the implant to sit in is made in the bone. Generally there is already a “hole” from where the tooth was removed but this isn’t a standardised shape and so the area is shaped to fit the implant perfectly. 


 3)   It is at this point that the debate starts.

a.    Sometimes the implant screw is placed and then covered over and the gum is “sealed” with stitches
b.    Other times a “healing abutment” is placed on top of the screw which pokes through the gum. It looks like a small silver button on the gum in the mouth – lots of fun to scare children with.
                                          i.    After either a or b there is a period of osseointegration a.k.a integration of the implant with the bone of the jaw before any sort of crown, bridge or denture is placed on them. This allows for the implant to become more “part” of the jaw than a false object before you start expecting it to carry the weight of biting force.
                                         ii.    This process of osseointegration takes between 3 and 6 months depending what you read.
                                        iii.    During this time you will of course have a space where the tooth was. If you had coped fine with this space before seeking an implant then you can carry on with a space, however if you have had the tooth taken out or it has been knocked out in fact then you may not fancy walking around with a gap. The only realistic option is a temporary denture which will replace this missing tooth. Sadly it is a reality that if there is any period of time of healing then you will need a temporary option to fill the space and you just have to accept this I’m afraid.
c.    The implant, abutment and temporary version of whatever the final restoration is planned to be is placed straight away. The temporary version is not in the bite, i.e. there is a gap between the teeth so that biting forces are not applied to the implant while it heals. This of course means that you have a nicer option than a temporary standard denture but it will not be the final object and you will have to go back in a few months to have this done.
d.    Of course the above point is irrelevant if the decision is made to place the implant, abutment and final restoration i.e. crown/bridge/denture immediately. Of course this sounds like the ideal option. Minimal time spent, it’s what they use on those 10 years younger programmes so it must be good etc however it does not allow any time for this “osseointegration” before you are expecting a false titanium screw to stand up to the forces you apply when chewing through an overcooked steak. Imagine trying to walk on a hip replacement within hours of it being placed. You just wouldn’t and the same usually applies with dental implants but as with everything there are differing schools of thought.




Why you SHOULD wait?
Why you SHOULDN’T.
A study by Adell et al. 1981 conclude that loading i.e. allowing the implant to take biting forces straight away after placement can interfere with healing. Ideally, we want bone to form all the way around the implant so that it becomes almost part of the jaw. If biting forces are applied to the implant too soon, the implant moves within the jaw (only minimal amounts like vibrations) meaning that instead of bone forming around the implant, soft squishy stuff forms instead –like when you pick off a scab too early and this inevitably will lead the implant to fail.
Studies have found that immediate implant loading achieved similar success rates as those reported in the delayed 2-stage approach therefore, who cares about all the theory.

Covering over the most important bit of the dental implant – the actual implant bit, allows for safe healing and protection of it from all the bacteria in the saliva.
If the implants are to be placed in the lower jaw, then there is more chance of success with immediate placing of the final crown/bridge/denture

Some research suggests that GENTLE loading of the implant right after placement actually helps the strength of bone healing around the implant, a bit like gentle exercise after any operation will help with healing.

Stage
Eh?
Other info – if you’re still with me
Healing
As mentioned above, this takes around 3-6 months
During this time you will probably be going backwards and forwards to see whoever placed the implant(s) to  check healing, check how the gum is forming around the implant and to make any adjustments to temporary dentures etc
Restoration
This is the placing of the final crown, bridge or denture on top of the implant.

Looking after the damn things
It is important to again reiterate that dental implants are not natural teeth. They don’t act in the same way, they don’t fail in the same way. It is also worth noting that when an implant fails, it is really bad. If a tooth breaks or has to be taken out, then usually its just the tooth that’s the problem.
According to Carl Misch, DDS, MDS (lots of letters after his name so he must be important) “when the implant fails, it also destroys the bone around the implant” often to the point where the whole plate of bone in front of the implant (the bit that you can feel under you gum) is completely lost
Similarly,  “if that implant happens to have been placed on a bone graft, this means that this particular implant failure could result in insufficient bone to re-implant” i.e. there’s sod all that can be done if it fails.
It is worth mentioning at this point that dental implants don’t last forever. They have a life span just as hip replacements, boob jobs etc do. If you look after them well i.e. keep them clean, have regularly checks with your dentist and hygienist visits, don’t smoke, have ideal medical fitness then you could be looking at 20 years. HOWEVER during this time you will likely have to have the crown/bridge/denture on top of the implant modified as they will get worn or damaged by eating and so on.
.


 So, in summary,
1)    Don’t smoke
2)    If you have gum disease, don’t even think about asking for an implant
3)    If you want a quick fix, implants are not for you. Similarly if the thought of having a scalpel/bone drill coming at you makes you feel sick/dizzy then implants are not for you
4)    If the thought of having a denture puts the fear into you, then again, implants are not for you. In 99% of cases you wear a short term denture while the area of infection after taking the tooth out heals, or while the implant heals
5)    If you have no bone, you can’t have an implant unless you are suitable for bone grafting which takes time, effort, money and could potentially also fail.
6)     Go and see a specialist who knows what they're doing and can fix problems if/when they arise

I realise this was probably very hard going on the reading front, and admittedly it was probably written more for my benefit of learning through researching but maybe it will help someone!

As always, if you have any questions please feel free to ask. Finally, apologies for the varying fonts used on the pictures, I think I may have been losing the plot as I neared the end. 


Stuff I looked at
Gapski R, Wang H-L, Mascarenhas P, Lang NP. Critical review of immediate implant loading.  Clin. Oral Impl. Res, 14, 2003; 515–527
Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B. & Bra˚nemark, P.I. (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery 10: 387–416
Bra˚nemark, P.I., Adell, R., Breine, U., Hansson, B.O., Lindstrom, J. & Ohlsson, A     1969 Intra osseous anchorage of dental prosthesis I: Experimental studies Scandinavian Journal of Plasticand Reconstructive Surgery 3: 81–100.

http://www.drchetan.com/dentalpics/plog-content/images/dental-instruments/dental-implants/dental-implant-14.jpg